24/7 FSE Hotline +1-800-465-6442 · [email protected] EN | ES | FR-CA
In-vitro diagnostics and care-setting systems

Hologic systems planned around laboratory and care workflow

Compare analyzer throughput, sample handling, detector maintenance, home-care capacity, LIS connectivity, and service assumptions before a facility commits to a configuration.

Clinical laboratory and diagnostic imaging team reviewing Hologic workflow systems
600–2,000tests/hour comparison envelope*
99.5%uptime planning target
<6hTier-1 MTTR planning window
2care tracks: lab + home rehab
ISO 13485QMS reference framework

*Industry configuration envelope for comparison planning. Confirm model-specific performance, clearance status, and intended use in the applicable IFU.

Regulatory and quality references

Credentials that procurement teams expect to see early

Use these as diligence anchors. Exact market status remains product-, revision-, and geography-specific.

FDA 510(k) clearance reference mark

FDA 510(k)

Premarket notification pathway for substantial equivalence where applicable. Prefer “FDA cleared” language for 510(k) products.

CE IVDR and MDR conformity mark

CE MDR / IVDR

European conformity references under MDR 2017/745 and IVDR 2017/746 for covered device families.

ISO 13485 quality management mark

ISO 13485

Medical device quality management system framework for design controls, CAPA, and supplier oversight.

IEC 60601 electrical safety mark

IEC 60601

Medical electrical equipment safety and essential performance expectations for applicable powered systems.

Care-setting applications

Start with the clinical environment, not a SKU list

Representative decision prompts

Three questions that reshape a Hologic brief

These are planning scenarios, not named-hospital endorsements or guaranteed outcomes.

“Can the detector maintenance cycle and spare-parts SLA support a five-day mammography schedule without cascading cancellations?”

Anonymous imaging operations director avatar

Imaging operations director
Community hospital scenario

“What coefficient of variation and method-comparison package must we complete before patient reporting on a new immunoassay menu?”

Anonymous laboratory quality manager avatar

Laboratory quality manager
Core-lab verification scenario

“Does the home-care lift and bed package include documented patient weight capacity, battery runtime, and service training for our agency?”

Anonymous home health procurement lead avatar

Home health procurement lead
Agency fleet scenario

Make four planning dimensions explicit before configuration

Volume hourly arrival and peak profile
Menu assays, modalities, care SKUs
Quality QC, calibration, LOD / CV limits
Support uptime, parts, MTTR escalation
Request a clinical specialist consult

Bring the specimen volume, detector fleet, or care roster

We will structure a product, service, and local verification conversation without treating brochure numbers as guaranteed site performance.

  • Model-specific IFU and intended-use review
  • Service coverage and spare-parts assumptions
  • Connectivity expectations for HL7 / DICOM where used
  • Acceptance criteria for local method verification
Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid work email.
Please enter your organization.
Please select an inquiry path.
Please describe the requirement.
Consent is required to submit this form.